Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond have offered their backing to the refreshed version of the motoring programme, according to those now steering the long-running show.
The updated Prime Video series debuted on September 4 with three new presenters at the helm: social media personality Francis Bourgeois alongside YouTube automotive content creators Thomas Holland and James Engelsman.
Holland and Engelsman are primarily recognised for establishing the automotive YouTube platform Throttle House, which has cultivated a significant global viewership through vehicle assessments, driving evaluations and motoring-themed entertainment.
The newly installed presenting team appear alongside Clarkson, May and Hammond within the opening episode, with the departing presenters reportedly expressing encouragement regarding the programme’s future direction.
During interviews, Bourgeois noted that the original trio urged the new hosts to establish their own identity within the series.
He indicated that the veteran presenters emphasised the importance of remaining faithful to the programme’s fundamental character while keeping automotive passion at the forefront.
Andy Wilman, who produced content alongside Clarkson, May and Hammond for numerous years, shared insights during an appearance on TellyCast.
Following viewing the new presenting team, Clarkson reportedly responded with a characteristically direct observation expressing surprise at the approach taken.
Wilman clarified that the comment reflected genuine approval of the new direction rather than any negative assessment, noting that Clarkson had embraced the reboot after recognising the new hosts possessed genuine credibility.
While Clarkson offered words of encouragement and expressed confidence that audiences would appreciate the fresh team, May proved more restrained in providing specific guidance.
Holland recounted May’s philosophy as being reminiscent of a deliberately cryptic approach.
Engelsman reported that Hammond had been supportive throughout the transition period.
Regarding potential resistance from dedicated followers accustomed to the previous format, Holland emphasised that considerable effort had been invested in ensuring the new iteration remained faithful to the essence of its predecessor.
He stated that the objective had been to create something that acknowledges and respects the qualities audiences valued in the original programme.